Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00739
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AUSTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv17284
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
LAURA AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv03442
Plaintiff:
Terrell Price
Defendant:
Mr. Snively, Swietzer, Ms. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. Logan County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Sterling
Defendant:
Logan County Sheriff's Department, Jim Baughman, Logan County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tansimore v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
James Tansimore
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Judge Corley, Laura Austin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv01256
Plaintiff:
Herbert R Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Phillip Corley, Sarah Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOREMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04160
Plaintiff:
CHUCK FOREMAN , ANTHONY RONALD YARY , JAMIE SUZANNE YARY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Petitioner:
JOHN GOODMAN and PHYLLIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
