Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Denton v. Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services et al
as 6:2026cv01263
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Denton
Defendant:
Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services, Laura Howard, Robin Lohman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Civil Disabilities Act
Howard v. Unique Vacations Inc., et al
as 3:2026cv04145
Plaintiff:
Laura Howard
Defendant:
Johnson Outdoors Diving LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hickman v. Howard
as 5:2026cv03196
Petitioner:
Harvey D. Hickman
Respondent:
Laura Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brull v. Howard et al
as 5:2026cv03119
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Brull
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Dr. Lindsey Dinkle-Topps, Haleigh Bennett-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Suttington et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 2:2026cv02030
Plaintiff:
Sean Anthony Suttington
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Mark A. Dupree, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickman v. Kobach et al
as 5:2025cv03225
Plaintiff:
Harvey D. Hickman
Defendant:
Kris Kobach, Laura Howard, Kenneth Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hemby v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2025cv03071
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Hemby, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Laura Kelly, Kris Kobach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
