Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
CHARLESTON v. LAURENS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail, PEACOCK, NURSE CRYSTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. LAURENS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant:
LAURENS COUNTY JAIL, CAPTAIN PEACOCK and NURSE CRYSTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Laurens County Jail
as 3:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Holland
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail and Amberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Laurens County Jail
as 1:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Holland
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gambrell v. Laurens County Jail
as 8:2015cv04777
Petitioner:
Randal Scot Gambrell, Jr
Respondent:
Laurens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gambrell v. Director of Laurens County Jail et al
as 6:2015cv03995
Plaintiff:
Randal Scot Gambrell, Jr
Defendant:
Director of Laurens County Jail and Laurens County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Laurens County Jail et al
as 6:2014cv02066
Defendant:
Laurens County Jail, Ricky Chastain, Mjr Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vernon George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Pike v. Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-11283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY P. PIKE
Defendant - Appellee:
N. W. CHISM, Doctor, Laurens County Jail, DWAYNE AYERS, Doctor, Calhoun State Prison, IKECHUKWU AKUAWANNE, Doctor, Baldwin State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
