Cases 11 - 20 of 23
DUE vs. CAMP, et al.
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
DUE v. CAMP et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F D GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pallett v. Thalken et al
as 8:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Pallett
Defendant:
Laurie Smith Camp and Thomas D. Thalken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pallett v. Smith Camp et al
as 8:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Pallett
Defendant:
Laurie Smith Camp and Thomas D. Thalken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America et al v. Smith Camp et al
as 8:2012cv00327
Defendant:
Any Unknown Others and Laurie Smith Camp
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Kozak and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Bradley v. Warren Urbom, et al
as 11-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Warren K. Urbom, David L. Piester, William G. Cambridge and others
Juan Bradley v. Warren Urbom, et al
as 11-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Warren K. Urbom, Laurie Smith Camp, Joseph F. Bataillon and others
Bradley v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2010cv00425
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bataillon, District Court Clerks, Richard G. Kopf and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00410
Defendant:
All Federal Court Judges In This State, Joseph Bataillion, William Cambridge and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Urbom et al
as 8:2010cv00358
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bataillon, Richard Kopf, David L. Piester and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
