Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIU v. FOUJOY et al
as 2:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHUANQI LIU
Defendant:
FOUJOY, YBEKI, LINGMAI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WILSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
KENNETH WILSON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCI LAU. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. FIGUREROA et al
as 2:2021cv03372
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CYNTHIA FIGUREROA, LATOYA CARR-HERMITT, CHARLENE SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lau, et al
as 1:2021cv01140
Plaintiff:
Larry Trent Roberts
Defendant:
David Lau, City of Harrisburg and John Baer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lau v. Penn-Mar Organization, INC
as 1:2019cv02153
Defendant:
Penn-Mar Organization, INC
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LAU et al v. NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
DUNG H. LAU and PROVIDENCE RECOVERY HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA and ZONING HEARING BOARD OF NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAU v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv02208
Plaintiff:
WIEN YAN JAMIE LAU
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LAU et al
as 2:2016cv05665
Plaintiff:
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN E. LAU , FRANK DELUCA , EDWARD KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
