Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Campaign Legal Center v. Scott
as 22-50692
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Campaign Legal Center, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Texas, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John B. Scott, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Campaign Legal Center et al v. Scott
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Campaign Legal Center, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Texas, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John B. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
PARNELL et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01570
Defendant:
BETHANY HALLAM, RICH FITZGERALD, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LUKE NEGRON, SEAN PARNELL, JAY HAGERMAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Common Cause Pennsylvania and ACLU of Pennsylvania
Intervenor:
AUSTIN DAVIS, Ed Gainey and Pennsylvania Democratic Party
Intervenor Defendant:
Conor Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook County Republican Party v. Pritzker, et al.,
as 1:2020cv04676
Defendant:
William J. Kresse, Marisel A. Hernandez, Karen A. Yabrough and others
Plaintiff:
Cook County Republican Party
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC
Amicus Curiae:
Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Illinois Public Interest Research Group, Chicago Votes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harlan et al v. Scholz et al
as 1:2016cv07832
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harlan and Crawford County Republican Central Committee
Defendant:
Charles W. Scholz , Ernest L. Gowen , Betty J. Coffrin and others
Intervenor_defendant:
David Orr
Amicu:
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago , Action Now Institute , CHANGE Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
