Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Shalena Carter v. Kirk Frith, et al
as 18-30877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHALENA CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL WEATHERLY, individually and in his official capacity, ROY COX, individually and in his official capacity; incorrectly designated as Roy Fox and LEE HARRELL, incorrectly designated as Richland Detention Center
Nafessa Naylor v. Lee Harrell, et al
as 17-30164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAFESSA H. NAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE HARRELL, TERRY PARRISH, LUCILLE WALKER and others
Curry v. Fontenot et al
as 3:2016cv01124
Plaintiff:
Derrick W Curry
Defendant:
Michael Fontenot, Scott Leehy, Robert Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naylor v. Harrell et al
as 3:2016cv00817
Plaintiff:
Nafessa H Naylor
Defendant:
Lee Harrell, Terry Parish, Lucille Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Harrell
as 3:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
James Brown Jackson
Defendant:
Lee Harrell, Roy Cox, Fred Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Moss v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections, et al
as 15-30967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DAN MOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KEVIN COBB, Sheriff, LEE HARRELL, Sheriff and others
Collins v. Harrell et al
as 3:2015cv02356
Plaintiff:
Glen Collins
Defendant:
Lee Harrell, Douglas Wheeler, Fargala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankenll v. Weatherly et al
as 3:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Otis Frankenll
Defendant:
Joel Weatherly and Lee Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. Harrell et al
as 3:2015cv01223
Plaintiff:
Melissa McMahon
Defendant:
Lee Harrell and Christopher Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Hayes et al
as 3:2014cv01810
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blake
Defendant:
Karen Hayes, Robert James, Bill Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
