Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HENRY COUNTY COUNCIL et al
as 1:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
HENRY COUNTY COUNCIL, HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RICK MCCORKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HENRY COUNTY COUNCIL et al
as 2:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
HENRY COUNTY COUNCIL, HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RICK MCCORKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13271
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Winn, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk, Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunley
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Shamarcus Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
