Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv02959
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv02949
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Johnson v. Marlboro County
as 4:2022cv02774
Plaintiff:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Marlboro County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2021cv01131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Financials Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Loyd Blankfien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Apple Inc et al
as 6:2019cv02548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Tim Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CLP Myrtle Waves, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv01670
Defendant:
Parc Management, LLC, MBMW, LLC, Myrtle Waves Water Park and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv01509
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Record
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv03176
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 4:2018cv02368
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Brian Sterling and Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Apple Inc et al
as 6:2017cv02149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Tim Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
