Cases 1 - 10 of 22
SSC CORAOPOLIS OPERATING COMPANY LP v. LEHMAN
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
SSC CORAOPOLIS OPERATING COMPANY LP doing business as WEST HILLS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Defendant:
GAIL R. LEHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
GRIFFIN et al v. LEHMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00866
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. GRIFFIN and LORI ANN GRIFFIN
Defendant:
M.D. JOHN D. LEHMAN, HERITAGE VALLEY MULTISPECIALTY GROUP, INC. doing business as HVMG ORTHO, HERITAGE VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BULLINS v. JIN et al
as 2:2016cv01048
Plaintiff:
KAMAIYO BULLINS
Defendant:
BYUNGAK JIN, IRMA VIHLIDAL, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TRIPATI v. HALE et al
as 2:2013cv00830
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
MARK W. HALE, DARIUS HOLMES, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEHMAN et al v. WYETH et al
as 1:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
JOYCE LEHMAN and HOWARD LEHMAN
Defendant:
WYETH , PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC , GREENSTONE LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
