Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marvin Leo Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Cox
as 2:2022cv02006
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Leo Williams
Defendant:
Richard Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scheider et al v. Staggs et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Jacqueline Staggs and Willie Leo Staggs
Plaintiff:
Volkmar Boehm, Torsten Teichmann, Anja Scheider and others
Interested Party:
ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMorris v. USA
as 2:2019cv00047
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roderick Leo McMorris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tri-Cities Gold, Inc. v. Talisman Investments, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Tri-Cities Gold, Inc.
Defendant:
Talisman Investments, Inc. , Leo Gorham and Bradley Gorham
Counter_claimant:
Bradley Gorham , Leo Gorham and Talisman Investments, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Tri-Cities Gold, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Edwards
as 2:2017cv02743
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Leo H Edwards
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Deem v. Carney
as 3:2016cv02490
Plaintiff:
Scott Leo Deem
Defendant:
John W. Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearden v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02472
Petitioner:
Leo Bearden
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Schaefer v. Depriest et al
as 2:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tracy Schaefer
Defendant:
Leo Depriest and Leo's Food Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
