Cases 1 - 10 of 422
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Derrick Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 24-50115
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Quartshezz Leonard Lewis
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riche v. Forrest County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Justin Riche
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail, Unknown Lewis, Major Unknown Carson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis vs Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Rivers
as 3:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Courtney Jarmain Lewis and Courtney Jarmaine Lewis
Respondent:
C Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
