Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
In re L.G. Philips LCD Co.,Ltd
as 11-1518
Plaintiff - Appellee: Betty O. Abrams, Betty O. Abrams, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Justin Coren, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: LG. Phillips LCD Co. Ltd., Bon Joon Koo, Ron H. Wirahadiraksa and others
Objector - Appellant: Orloff Fam Tr UAD 12/13/01Marshall J Orloff & Ann S. Orloff TTEES
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
: In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent: USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, MOTOROLA, INC. and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Davis v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv03070
Plaintiff: Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis and others
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Company Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Getz v. LG Philips LCD Company, Limited et al
as 3:2007cv03066
Plaintiff: R Rex Getz
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Company, Limited, LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Aspen Building Technology, Inc. v. LG Phillips LCD Co., LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02995
Plaintiff: Aspen Building Technology, Inc., Aspen Building Technology, Inc., Aspen Building Technology, Inc. and others
Defendant: LG Phillips LCD Co., LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation v. LG Phillips LCD Co., LTD et al
as 2:2007cv00176
Defendant: LG Phillips LCD Co., LTD, LG Philips LCD America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Audio Video Artistry v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv02325
Defendant: LG Electronics Inc., Royal Phillips Electronics NV, Phillips Consumer Electronics North America and others
Plaintiff: Audio Video Artistry
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant: Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor: Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein, Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court: Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Interested Party: Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Amicus Curiae: State of South Carolina, State of California
Claimant: Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee: Charles W Daff
Petitioner: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant: Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?