Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant: Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor: Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein, Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court: Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Interested Party: Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Amicus Curiae: State of South Carolina, State of California
Claimant: Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee: Charles W Daff
Petitioner: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant: Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, MOTOROLA, INC. and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Audio Video Artistry v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv02325
Defendant: LG Electronics Inc., Royal Phillips Electronics NV, Phillips Consumer Electronics North America and others
Plaintiff: Audio Video Artistry
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
In re L.G. Philips LCD Co.,Ltd
as 11-1518
Plaintiff - Appellee: Betty O. Abrams, Betty O. Abrams, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Justin Coren, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: LG. Phillips LCD Co. Ltd., Bon Joon Koo, Ron H. Wirahadiraksa and others
Objector - Appellant: Orloff Fam Tr UAD 12/13/01Marshall J Orloff & Ann S. Orloff TTEES
Davis v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv03070
Plaintiff: Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis, Kathleen C. Davis and others
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Company Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
McKay v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01348
Defendant: NEC Corporation, Sanyo Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John McKay, John McKay, John McKay
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Sherman-Clayton Act
Scott v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01822
Defendant: Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Ann Scott, Ann Scott, Ann Scott and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Abrams v. LG. Phillips LCD Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00909
Defendant: Hee Gook Lee, Ki Seon Park, Rudy Provoost and others
Plaintiff: Betty O. Abrams, Betty O. Abrams, Betty O. Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: Securities Exchange Act
Rywelski v. AU Optronics Corp, et al
as 0:2007cv01393
Defendant: Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd, Sanyo North America Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?