Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. H. Clarke
as 20-6529
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT D. WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HARLEY COLNA, CORRECTIONS OFFICER FELTS, LIEUTENANT EVANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6665
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O J. ROSENBAUM, DOSS, NURSE MS. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Kevin Sorrick v. Lawrence Manning
as 17-7291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNATHAN SORRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR LAWRENCE MANNING, DOCTOR JASON CLEM, DOCTOR PAUL MATERA and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 14-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, THE, in its corporate capacity, for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
