Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jane Doe v. MG Freesites Ltd.
as 25-2418
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MG FREESITES LTD., d/b/a Pornhub.com, HAMMY MEDIA LTD., d/b/a xHamster.com, MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. and others
Jane Does 1-9 v. Hammy Media Ltd.
as 25-2411
Plaintiff:
JANE DOES 1-9
Defendant:
HAMMY MEDIA LTD., d/b/a xHamster.com, MG FREESITES LTD., d/b/a Pornhub.com, MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. and others
Doe 1 et al v. Murphy et al
as 7:2022cv03576
Defendant:
Limestone University, MindGeek Holding also known as MindGeek USA Inc also known as MG Holdings USA Corp doing business as Pornhub.com, Collins Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Limestone University et al
as 7:2021cv03193
Defendant:
Limestone University, Limestone College, Collins Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnette et al v. Limestone College et al
as 7:2020cv04260
Defendant:
Limestone College, Darrell Parker, Janie Cory and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Scanlon, Carly Brengosz, Alexandra Chappell Arnette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Does 1-9 v. Murphy et al
as 7:2020cv00947
Defendant:
MindGeek Holding SARL, Limestone College, Collins Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Phillips v. Limestone College
as 7:2015cv04613
Plaintiff:
Lisa B Phillips
Defendant:
Limestone College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
