Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Livia Scotto v. Commission, et al
as 24-1418
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
THE COMMISSION, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS and others
Livia Scotto v. Commission, et al
as 23-3185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMISSION, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS and others
Scotto v. McDonough
as 24-1187
Claimant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Livia Scotto v. USA, et al
as 23-2474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. and UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, ET AL
Defendant:
JESSICA M. MCCLEAN, ET AL., AND ALL AND ANY OTHER DEFENDANTS HERETOFORE FILED, ET AL and VOLKS ANWALT LAW FIRM, OF NEW YORK, ET AL
SCOTTO v. THE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2023cv02870
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
THE COMMISSION, ARNSTEIN LEHR, U.S. DISTRICT COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTTO v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M SCOTTO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ET AL., OPM, ET AL, JESSICA M MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livia Scotto v. Saul Ewing, et al
as 22-3436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant:
SAUL EWING, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, ATTORNEY GREVIENCE COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT, ET AL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Livia Scotto v. USA, et al
as 22-3247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JONATHAN BEATTY, MICHAEL DUNLAP and others
Livia Scotto v. Saul Ewing, et al
as 22-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
SAUL EWING, ARNSTEIN AND LEHR, ATTORNEY GREVIENCE COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT, et al and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
