Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lockett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01333
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lockett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lusk et al v. Serve U Brands, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv06451
Plaintiff:
Skyler Lusk , Tia Council , Viktoria O'Brien and others
Defendant:
Serve U Brands, Inc. , Insomnia Cookies, LLC and Seth Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. New Haven
as 3:2015cv01311
Plaintiff:
Troy Adams , Sean Ahern , Patrick Andrews and others
Defendant:
City of New Haven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Grant et al v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2015cv00445
Defendant:
Damon Lockett, Syracuse Police Department, City of Syracuse and others
Not Classified By Court:
William Pease and Gustave J. DiBianco
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Grant and Alonzo Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Margolla (Shamsundar)
as 14-3766
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jesus Irizarry Negron, AKA Pablo, Carlos Martinez, AKA B-Way, Roberto Margolla and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Clifford Shamsundar, AKA Face
Whitehaven Sherwood Forest, LLC v. Lockett et al
as 1:2014cv05401
Plaintiff:
Whitehaven Sherwood Forest, LLC
Defendant:
Brenda Lockett and Hofeld and Schaffner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
