Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pertee v. Risher
as 24-10027
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bruce Pertee
Defendant:
David Risher, CEO Lyft, Incorporated, Logan Green, CEO Lyft President, Chris Lambert, CEO Lyft and others
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan et al v. Logan
as 4:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Henry Logan and Hannah Logan
Defendant:
Peggy Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. City of San Antonio
as 23-50746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Perez and Matilde Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
City of San Antonio
Amicus Curiae:
International Council of Thirteen Grandmothers and Carol Logan
Rice v. Pittmon et al
as 4:2023cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lori Rice
Defendant:
Doyle Logan Pittmon and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pertee v. Risher et al
as 3:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bruce Pertee
Defendant:
David Risher, Logan Green, Chris Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roberts et al v. Barr
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Tanya Roberts and Regina Syas
Defendant:
Logan Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lutostanski v. Brown
as 23-50257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen C. Lutostanski, Amanda Logan and Andria Dowie
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Brown, Jeffrey W. Travillion, Sr., Brigid Shea and others
Esquivel v. Kendrick
as 22-50979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert J. Esquivel and Robert James Esquivel
Defendant / Appellee:
David Kendrick, Badge #0567, Patrol Division, San Antonio Police Department, Logan Eastburn, DPS, Trooper #14720, Ryan Bibby, DPS, Trooper #14593 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
