Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Harris #440974 v. Singerling et al
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dejuan Harris #440974
Defendant:
Nicholas Singerling and Shane Hoag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Stone Treasures, LTD, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11389
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stone Treasures, LTD, LLC, Steve Hamade and Lorenzo Gonzalez-Heurerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Townsend #201112 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Townsend #201112
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Suzanne Groff, Rosemary Villasan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Murray et al
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lorenzo Ladale Murray, Brian Gramm, Edustaff, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Adams v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2022cv11024
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Mary Adams Semcken, Susan Kay Adams and others
Gaffney #614338 v. Artis et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Gaffney #614338
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis and Unknown King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris #440974 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Dejuan Harris #440974
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bates v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00920
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Maurice Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
