Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Flavin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company et al
as 1:2015cv11796
Plaintiff:
Jane Flavin
Defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company , Garber Bros. Inc. and Albert H. Notini & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N.A. of Tobacco Outlets, Inc., et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 13-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOBACCO OUTLETS, INC., CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENCE, RI, PROVIDENCE BOARD OF LICENSES, PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Interested Party:
RI DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, AND HOSPITALS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, - RI Chapters and TOBACCO CONTROL LEGAL CONSORTIUM
Moore v. Lorillard Tobacco Company
as 1:2012cv10278
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Moore
Defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. et al v. City of Providence, Rhode Island et al
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. , Cigar Association of America, Inc. , Lorillard Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
City of Providence, Rhode Island , Providence Board of Licenses , Providence Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2011cv40110
Plaintiff:
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company , Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Massachusetts, Division of Public Health of Worcester, Massachusetts, B. Dale McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
United Senior Assoc. v. Philip Morris Inc., et al
as 06-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED SENIOR ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP MORRIS INC., R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACC, BROWN & WILLIAMSON and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
