Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sotello v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv02591
Respondent:
Ford Motor Company, Haberfelde Ford and Haberfelde Ford a California Corporation doing business as Jim Burke Ford Lincoln
Petitioner:
Lorrie Lee Sotello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sotello v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAE/1:18-CV-00261
Plaintiff:
Sotello and Lorrie Lee Sotello
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Haberfelde Ford a California Corporation doing business as Jim Burke Ford Lincoln
Sotello v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Lee Sotello
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Haberfelde Ford and Haberfelde Ford a California Corporation Doing business as Jim Burke Ford Lincoln
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lee et al v. Howmedica Osteonbics et al
as 0:2015cv02809
Plaintiff:
Lorri Lee and Mark Lee
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Coporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Snake River Irrigators Association v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 4:2015cv05039
Plaintiff:
Columbia Snake River Irrigators Association
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Reclamation, Estevan Lopez and Lorri Lee
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BRISTER et al v. NATOINAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03693
Plaintiff:
WALTER BRISTER , BONNIE BRISTER , PAUL R. TRIPOLI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kostick et al v. Nago et al
as 1:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kostick , Kyle Mark Takai , David P. Brostrom and others
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago , State of Hawaii 2011 Reapportionment Commission , Victoria Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunakin et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv22332
Plaintiff:
Ray Dunakin , Daniel D. Fitzgerald , William E. Harilson and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
