Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Christopher Washington v. Benjamin Loveridge
as 16-2484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER E. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN D. LOVERIDGE, Doctor
NIKSICH v. CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00206
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, WILLIAM L CARR and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J NIKSICH
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAILEY v. OWEN et al
as 1:2016cv01312
Defendant:
BEGUHN, CONWAY, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY A. DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00408
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Loveridge v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Loveridge
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WASHINGTON v. LOVERIDGE
as 1:2016cv01017
Defendant:
BENJAMIN D. LOVERIDGE
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERHILL v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 1:2016cv00687
Defendant:
CASSANDRA BROWN, BENJAMIN LOVERIDGE, MS. ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mather et al
as 1:2016mc00006
Plaintiff:
Neil Mather and Alan Roberts
Objector:
Carlyle Investment Management LLC , TC Group, LLC , TCG Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
KYLES v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv01307
Defendant:
MARIS, BROWN, CLARKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED KYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIDLER v. CORIZON MEDICAL et al
as 1:2015cv01294
Defendant:
DESMA ALLEN, CORIZON MEDICAL and BENJAMEN LOVERIDGE
Plaintiff:
JOHN W FIDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
