Cases 1 - 10 of 50
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Justin Downing v. LOW, et al
as 23-16102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN DOWNING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., a North Carolina corporation, FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
HUBER v. LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2022cv03571
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HUBER
Defendant:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carey v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv03263
Plaintiff:
Bryan Carey
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01220
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies Inc. and Jeffrey Green
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Samsung Top-Load
as 20-6097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS MORGAN
Amicus Curiae:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Neal v. Lowes Companies, Inc. et al
as MN/0:20-CV-01003
Defendant:
Lowes Companies, Inc
Plaintiff:
Neal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
