Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Ramos Cuenca v. Garland
as 24-2483
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RAMOS CUENCA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RAMOS v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Fragoso Vazquez et al
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Ivonne Fragoso Vazquez, Luis Ramos Negron, Iyariz Santos Ojeda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Fragoso Vazquez et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Ivonne Fragoso Vazquez, Luis Ramos Negron, Iyariz Santos Ojeda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Luis Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luis Ramos v. Fleetwood Homes, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02360
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramos
Defendant:
Fleetwood Homes, Inc., Cavco Industries, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Kumpe et al v. LER Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Angela Kumpe and Jeff Kumpe
Defendant:
LER Transportation, Inc. and Luis Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
