Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc. v. All Phase Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc.
Defendant:
All Phase Services, Inc. and Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc. v. All Phase Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc.
Defendant:
All Phase Services, Inc. and Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newman v. Pender Correctional Institution
as 5:2022ct03348
Plaintiff:
Robert Luke Newman
Defendant:
Pender Correctional Institution and Correctional Officer Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02100
Petitioner:
Luke Joseph Warner
Respondent:
Warden Ramos, FMC Devens, FBOP-DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Padilla-Amaya v. Zink et al
as 5:2021ct03383
Plaintiff:
Henry A. Padilla-Amaya
Defendant:
Michael Zink and Luke Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Luke Gravel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LUKE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LUKE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
VAN DYKE v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES et al
as 1:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
DR. MARK E. VAN DYKE
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES, KERANETICS, INC., VIRTUE LABS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
