Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Seay v. James et al
as 1:2023cv05232
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Lisa James and Antresa Lumpkin-Knighten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUMPKIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LUMPKIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LUMPKIN v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
NASEDRA KENON LUMPKIN
Respondent:
LEON COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnny Bullock v. Walter Berry, et al
as 23-12652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER BERRY, LUMPKIN, SANFORD and others
LUMPKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19177
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUMPKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH-LUMPKIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17387
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE SMITH-LUMPKIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nasedra Lumpkin v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11779
Petitioner / Appellant:
NASEDRA K. LUMPKIN
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nasedra LumpkinIn re: Nasedra Lumpkin
as 23-11698
Petitioner:
In re: NASEDRA K. LUMPKIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
