Cases 1 - 10 of 68
LUNSFORD v. BLACKBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
BLACKBURN, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
A. HARMON, GRAY, B. LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15875
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lunsford
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Avlon Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
WILSON v. KOENIG et al
as 1:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
A. KOENIG, J. GRAY, B. LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHCRAFT v. GEO GROUP et al
as 2:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
JOHN ASHCRAFT
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, SEIVER, FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIRDEN v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
WESLEY B BIRDEN
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. KOENIG et al
as 1:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
ALEXHANDER KOENIG, BRUMFIEL, LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
SAMMY JOSEPH, MYERS, PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
