Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
THOMPSON v. TODD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01462
Petitioner: LYNNE THOMPSON
Respondent: RANDAL B. TODD, ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. TOOD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01261
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: RANDAL B. TOOD, COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. PEAK ENERGY SERVICES USA, INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00266
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant: PEAK ENERGY SERVICES USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01415
Petitioner: LYNNE THOMPSON
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. TODD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01188
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: RANDAL B. TODD, ALLEGHENY COUNTY EXECUTIVE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. HOLLIS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00958
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: TODD J. HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CHOICE AUTO SALES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00925
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: CHOICE AUTO SALES, LENNY HAUCK, KURT - OWNER OF CHOICE AUTO SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv64659
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVEN THOMPSON and DEBRA LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?