Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
ST. CLAIRE-LYTLE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02020
Petitioner: NANCY ST. CLAIRE-LYTLE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Stacia Stiner, et al v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., et al
as 23-80030
Petitioner: STACIA STINER, LORESIA VALLETTE, Guardian Ad Litem for Lawrence Quinlan, HEATHER FISHER, Guardian Ad Litem for Ralph Schmidt and others
Respondent: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. and BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC
United States v. Robert Lytle
as 23-1770
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Robert Larry Lytle, also known as Larry Lytle
In re: Robert Lytle
as 22-3628
Petitioner: In re: Robert Larry Lytle
Justin Lytle, et al v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 22-80047
Respondent: JUSTIN LYTLE and CHRISTINE MUSTHALER
Petitioner: NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC. and NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02481
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01919
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as Successor Receiver on behalf of Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant: Todd Disner and Carol Lytle
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021ms00150
Plaintiff: Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as Successor Receiver on behalf of Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant: Todd Disner and Carol Lytle
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00665
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Lytle v. Warden Hudgins
as 21-7213
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT LARRY LYTLE
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN HUDGINS, FCI Gilmer Camp

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?