Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
(HC) Thomas v. USA (2255- 2:20-cr-0012 KJM)
as 2:2023cv01225
Petitioner: Reginald Lamont Thomas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Reginald Thomas
as 22-10284
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS
USA v. Reginald Thomas
as 22-10283
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS
Reginald Thomas v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70144
Not Classified By Court: In re: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Reginald Thomas v. USDC-SAC
as 21-71381
Not Classified By Court: In re: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
James Castle, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 21-70683
Not Classified By Court: In re: JAMES CHRISTOPHER CASTLE
Petitioner: REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS and JAMES CHRISTOPHER CASTLE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Thomas v. Young We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv07222
Plaintiff: DeQuan Lamont Thomas
Defendant: J. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. City of Tacoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv05518
Plaintiff: Cory Lamont Thomas and Darrell Montae Lee
Defendant: City of Tacoma, Tacoma Police Department, James Walton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv05234
Plaintiff: Cory Lamont Thomas
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Washington Corrections Center, Cedar Creek Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?