Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Monday v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Lacy J. Monday
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lacy v. Adult Probation Department et al
as 3:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Adrian Eugene Lacy and Adrian Lacy
Defendant:
Adult Probation Department and Michigan City Superior Court 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Laporte Police Dept
as 3:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Adrian Eugene Lacy and Adrian E Lacy
Defendant:
Laporte Police Dept and LaPorte Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. LaPorte County Jail
as 3:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Adrian Eugene Lacy and Adrian E Lacy
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Lacy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hines v. Fritter et al
as 3:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Cornelius LeMont Hines and Cornelius Hines
Defendant:
Sherri Fritter, Lacy Gorske, Nancy Marthakis MD and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LACY v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00499
Petitioner:
ENDRICE LACY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONDAY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
LACY J. MONDAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LACY v. CAESARS RIVERBOAT CASINO, LLC
as 4:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
E'TALKA LACY
Defendant:
CAESARS RIVERBOAT CASINO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES et al
as 1:2021cv01224
Defendant:
BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES and PETER LACY
Plaintiff:
CHRIS KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
