Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Murphy v. LaFever
as 1:2025cv00181
Petitioner:
Jennifer L. Murphy
Respondent:
Warden LaFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schulte v. LaFever
as 1:2025cv00169
Petitioner:
Christen D. Schulte
Respondent:
Warden M. LaFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stone v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2025cv00007
Defendant:
Rebecca Lafevers State Farm Agency INC, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Alfred Tom Cilio
Plaintiff:
Brian D Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
West Bend Insurance Company v. Conyers et al
as 4:2024cv00775
Defendant:
Talented Tots - Smithville, LLC, John Roe, Madison Conyers and others
Plaintiff:
West Bend Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mulliniks v. LaFever et al
as 3:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Dakota James Mulliniks
Defendant:
Officer f/n/u LaFever and Officer f/n/u l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Robinson v. LaFever
as 1:2024cv00470
Respondent:
Molly LaFever
Petitioner:
Donte Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robinson v. LaFever
as 5:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
Donte Robinson
Respondent:
Molly LaFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lafevers v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Elisha Brock Lafevers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
