Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Lamar Marte v. J C Tree Care NY Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv05749
Defendant:
Martha Velasco, Juan Carlos and J C Tree Care NY Corp.
Plaintiff:
Antony Lamar Marte
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. Georgia Oil, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03998
Defendant:
Faiyaz Mitha, Georgia Oil, LLC and BP America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lamar Hill
Lamar et al v. Mack Pest Control, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jon Lamar and Wesley Simmons
Defendant:
Mack Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Giron v. CMG Communications,LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02255
Defendant:
Maria Del Pilar Acosta, Carlos Guardia, CMG COMMUNICATIONS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Giron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carlucci, et al. v. Consolidated Networks Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv01610
Defendant:
Consolidated Networks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Vincent Carlucci and Lamar Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chatman et al v. Nowell Investigative Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10548
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chatman and Imeh Udoroh
Defendant:
Nowell Investigative Services, Inc. and Lamar N Nowell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HAYNES v. WILLIE LAMAR BLOCK & BRICK CONSTRUCTION et al
as 5:2017cv00442
Defendant:
WILLIE LAMAR BLOCK & BRICK CONSTRUCTION and WILLIE LAMAR
Plaintiff:
JIMMY HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Mackall et al v. Safelite Group, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02145
Plaintiff:
Lamar Mackall and Ryan Hunter
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Santos Lamar v. Massapequa Diner, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03386
Defendant:
"John Doe #1", "John Doe #2", "John Doe #3" and others
Plaintiff:
Eddy Santos Lamar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lamar Dawson v. NCAA, et al
as 17-15973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and PAC-12 CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
