Cases 1 - 10 of 94
WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
MERLE ROSS WEBB
Defendant:
KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
AKILAH LAMAR, JACKSON, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snelling v. St Joseph County Jail
as 3:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Terrence Snelling and Terrance Lamar Snelling, Jr
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khonsu El v. Indiana State of et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Selah Khonsu El and Lamar James Wilson, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Allen County of, Fort Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY LAMAR PARKER
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, SHERIFF, DUZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Forestal et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lamar Parker
Defendant:
Kerry J Forestal, Sheriff, Duze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Indiana State of
as 3:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Deshannon Lamar Grady, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST, et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, MR JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
