Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ivey et al v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv02289
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey, Marcus D. Ivey, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Asha Jackson, Anna Maseth Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
Claire T Landry
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04153
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Shaun Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel-Ivey et al v. Long et al
as 1:2019cv03950
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel-Ivey, Marcus D. Ivey, Melvin Mashaun Ivey and others
Defendant:
Moore, John Doe, James W. Conroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Landry v. J.P. Morgan Chase et al
as 1:2019cv03401
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase, Other Unknown Persons, US Bank National Association and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Johnson-Landry
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
McDaniel-Ivey v. Mann et al
as 1:2019mi00118
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel-Ivey
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, John Doe, Asha Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ivey et al v. Mann et al
as 1:2019cv00872
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey
Respondent:
Jeffrey Mann, Police Officer Landry, Gary Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RE: Notice of Lien
as 1:2019mi00026
Plaintiff:
Ivy T. Landry and Cassandra Johnson-Landry
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
