Cases 21 - 30 of 1,583
Lane v. City of Clarksburg
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Lane
Defendant:
City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Tang v. Canning
as 24-455
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and FARIS AL KOOHEJI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
SUSAN M. CANNING, ALAN D. FELDMAN, MICHAEL F. HINES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Manchanda v. Lane
as 24-395
Plaintiff:
RAHUL DEV MANCHANDA and Mrs. SYLWIA EWELINA MANCHANDA
Defendant:
DANA WALSH, AUSA, GREGORY ZIPES, AUST, SEAN LANE, SDNY Bankruptcy Judge and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. County of Lane
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANE, Oregon
Lane v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Myra Lane
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Trindade v. Sunnova Energy International Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Trindade
Defendant:
Sunnova Energy International Inc., William J. Berger and Robert L. Lane
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Dai'Quan Lane
as 24-4083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAI'QUAN JARRVEL LANE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
