Cases 31 - 40 of 1,585
Tang v. Canning
as 24-455
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and FARIS AL KOOHEJI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
SUSAN M. CANNING, ALAN D. FELDMAN, MICHAEL F. HINES and others
Manchanda v. Lane
as 24-395
Plaintiff:
RAHUL DEV MANCHANDA and Mrs. SYLWIA EWELINA MANCHANDA
Defendant:
DANA WALSH, AUSA, GREGORY ZIPES, AUST, SEAN LANE, SDNY Bankruptcy Judge and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. County of Lane
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANE, Oregon
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
US v. Dai'Quan Lane
as 24-4083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAI'QUAN JARRVEL LANE
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-CV-00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ivic v. Advance Stores Company, Incorporated et al
as 3:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Juraj Ivic
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Incorporated doing business as Advance Auto Parts, North Sunrise Corp., Lane-Valente Industries, Inc. and others
Gilardy v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gilardy
Defendant:
Ethan Brown, Mark J. Nelson, Phillip E. Hardin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
LANE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS LANE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
