Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. iPiccy Inc.
as 1:2019cv00913
Defendant:
iPiccy Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. iPiccy Inc.
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
iPiccy Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alcorn v. Amherst County Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2019cv00402
Defendant:
Sheriff Lane Perry, Henry County Jail, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Delberia Bradley Alcorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ouellette v. Lane et al
as 7:2019cv00342
Defendant:
Misty Lane and Southwest Regional Jail Athority
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Tazewell County Sheriff Department et al
as 7:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Tazewell County Sheriff Department, Lane, Criag Meneffee and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2019cv00129
Petitioner:
Travone Lamont Lane
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bradley et al v. Cunningham et al
as 7:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Otis Terry Cunningham and Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dawn Bradley Lane and Randolph Scott Bradley
Respondent:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Lane et al
as 7:2018cv00487
Defendant:
C.O. Lane and Duffield Regional Jail Facility
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoang v. Lane et al
as 1:2018cv01009
Defendant:
Bob Mihalco, Chris Lane, Crystal Mover Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hue D. Hoang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
