Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Electric Power Steering - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2013cv01901
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Lane, LLC
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, JTEKT Automotive North America, Inc., Showa Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Saratoga Lane, LLC v. JTEKT Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv12181
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Lane, LLC
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, JTEKT Automotive North America, Inc., Showa Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America v. Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Dollars ($18,720.00) in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2016cv11282
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Dollars ($18,720.00) in U.S. Currency, Fifty Seven Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Four Dollars ($57,664.00) in U.S. Currency, 2012 Nissan GTR VIN: JN1AR5EF1CM250304 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Lane et al v. C & Property Group, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv11225
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramsey and Gloria Lane
Defendant:
C & Property Group, L.L.C., India Sifford and Dennis P Sifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ford #374376 v. Kennerly et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Ford #374376
Defendant:
Michael C. Kennerly, Roger Gerlach, Richard Czop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sieradzki #193629 v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2015cv01340
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Sieradzki #193629
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Unknown Griswald and Jamal Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosgrove v. Trieweiler et al
as 2:2015cv12955
Plaintiff:
Cary Cosgrove
Defendant:
Tony Trieweiler, Davids, Brian Hadden and others
v. Christian et al
as 2:2015cv12864
Defendant:
Matthew Lane Christian and Ken Romanowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christian v. Romanowski
as 2:2015cv12846
Petitioner:
Matthew Lane Christian
Respondent:
Kenneth Romanowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
