Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Warden William Langdon, III
as 0:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
David Andrew Bowers
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Stirling et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Arthur William Macon
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Corrections and William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terron Dizzley v. William Langdon
as 23-7312
Petitioner:
TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM LANGDON
Woods v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv06377
Petitioner:
Cedric L. Woods
Defendant:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBoer et al v. 3M Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv04822
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dick DeBoer, Frank Huchro, Charles Robert Hudler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dizzley v. Warden William Langdon
as 8:2023cv04221
Petitioner:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv00990
Petitioner:
Comest Sabatino Allen
Respondent:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
