Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Elkin v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Camden Royal Palms, LLC and Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Elkin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David Elkins et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv00818
Plaintiff:
Laura Elkins and David Elkins
Defendant:
Honda North America, Inc., a California corporation, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., a California corporation, American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Laura Elkins, et al v. DC, et al
as 10-7069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Laura Elkins and John Robbins
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, Adrian Fenty, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, David Dee Noble, individually and in his official capacity as Administrator of the Building and Land Regulation Administration of the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs for the District of Columbia and others
Laura Elkins, et al v. DC, et al
as 10-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laura Elkins and John Robbins
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Adrian Fenty, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, David Dee Noble, individually and in his official capacity as Administrator of the Building and Land Regulation Administration of the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs for the District of Columbia and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1437
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
