Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SEIDMAN et al v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK, S.L.A. et al
as 2:2021cv20534
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE B. SEIDMAN, ARTHUR M WEIN and SPENCER SAVINGS BANK, S.L.A.
Defendant:
JOSE B GUERRERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parshall v. ASB Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
ASB Bancorp, Inc., Patricia S. Smith, John B. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rubin v. ASB Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
ASB Bancorp, Inc., Suzanne S. Deferie, Patricia S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rubin v. ASB Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00410
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
ASB Bancorp, Inc., Suzanne S. Deferie, Patricia S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Spencer Bank SLA v. Menlo Acquisition Corp
as 08-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER BANK SLA, a mutual savings and loan association
Defendant - Appellee:
MENLO ACQUISITION CORP, LAWRENCE B. SEIDMAN, SEIDMAN & ASSOC and others
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
OH BANKERS LEAGUE, PA BANKERS ASSN, WI BANKERS ASSN and others
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellant:
NJ LEAGUE COMM BANKERS, PA ASSN COMM BANKERS, NY BANKERS ASSN and others
SPENCER BANK, S.L.A. v. SEIDMAN et al
as 2:2007cv01337
Plaintiff:
SPENCER BANK, S.L.A.
Defendant:
LAWRENCE B. SEIDMAN, SEIDMAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC, VETERI PLACE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1464 Federal Savings and Loan
Neri, et al v. PL Capital, LLC, et al
as 1:2003cv10179
Plaintiff:
Nancy D. Neri, Gregory W. Boulos, Paul E. Bulman and others
Defendant:
PL Capital, LLC, Richard Lashley, Lawrence B. Seidman and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Terence D. Kenney, Central Co-Operative Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust and Joseph R. Doherty Family Limited Partnership, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
