Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Layfield v. United States of America
as 26-4737
Petitioner:
PHILIP JAMES LAYFIELD and Philip Samuel Pesin
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Layfield
as 26-4703
Defendant:
PHILIP JAMES LAYFIELD and Philip Samuel Pesin
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Layfield v. Hudson
as 4:2026cv00295
Petitioner:
Philip James Layfield
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(SS) Layfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01287
Plaintiff:
Joseph Layfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Layfield v. Guttierez et al
as 4:2025cv00680
Petitioner:
Philip James Layfield
Respondent:
Mark Guttierez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Philip James Layfield v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv11852
Petitioner:
Philip James Layfield
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sackett et al v. Legal & General America, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00092
Plaintiff:
Caitlin D Sackett, Cassandra L Gee, Cayla M Layfield and others
Defendant:
Legal & General America, Inc., Zachary Sackett and Joshua Sackett
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Balu v. Druckman, et al.
as 25-3497
Plaintiff:
ARVIND BALU
Defendant:
REBECCA DRUCKMAN, STEPHEN HEDSTROM, JAN LAYFIELD and others
Jennifer Layfield v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2025cv04450
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Layfield
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marcinov v. Advanced Reconstruction and Aesthetics PLLC et al
as 2:2024cv02235
Defendant:
Chris Layfield, Advanced Reconstruction and Aesthetics PLLC and Randall Craft
Plaintiff:
Elena Marcinov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
