Other Statutes Cases
Auclair v. Corning Incorporated
as 24-1172
Plaintiff: BRIAN AUCLAIR
Not Yet Classified: CORNING INCORPORATED, CORNING PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
Raul v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 4:2018cv01056
Plaintiff: Malka Raul
Defendant: Layne Christensen Company, David A.B. Brown, J. Samuel Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witmer v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 4:2018cv01051
Plaintiff: Colleen Witmer
Defendant: Layne Christensen Company, David A.B. Brown, J. Samuel Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Alba v. Layne Christensen Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00473
Plaintiff: Jose Alba
Defendant: Does and Layne Christensen Company
Arizona Water Company v. Layne Christensen Company
as 2:2014cv02489
Plaintiff: Arizona Water Company
Defendant: Layne Christensen Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FRAZIER, WILLIAM C. v. LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2004cv00315
Plaintiff: WILLIAM C. FRAZIER , FRAZIER INDUSTRIES, INC. and AIRBURST TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant: LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY and PROWELL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
FRAZIER V LAYNE CHRISTENSEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1584
Plaintiff-Appellant: Airburst Technology, LLC, Frazier Industries, Inc. and William C. Frazier
Defendant-Appellee: Layne Christensen Company and Prowell Technologies, Ltd.
BARBOUR WELL V CLAUDE LAVAL CORP
as 00-1404
Plaintiff-Appellant: BARBOUR WELL SURVEYING CORPORATION and JOEL S. BARBOUR
Defendant-Appellee: CCV ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., CLAUDE LAVAL CORPORATION and LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?