Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant:
Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Le v. Hartford, City of, et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Hai Quoc Le, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Hartford and Tressa Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Maclachlan v. Monroe et al
as 1:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Andrew MacLachlan #844474 and Andrew Maclaclan
Defendant:
Nikki Monroe, Robert Crompton, Addie Briske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 5:2023cv12633
Plaintiff:
Van Phuc Le
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MacLachlan #844474 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Andrew MacLachlan #844474
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Nikki Monroe, Robert Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Thuan et al
as 2:2023cv11290
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alden Timothy Cox and Alden Timothy Cox
Defendant:
Hoang Tan Thuan, Api-Le Tran Trung Hieu, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chilton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gene Le Victor Chilton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cunningham #976678 et al v. Burgess et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
George Cunningham #976678 and Jon Scott Stygler #678454
Respondent:
Michael Burgess and Les Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
