Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Herring v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02909
Defendant:
Turbeville Correctional Institute, Associate Warden Gary Leamon, Turbeville Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Tyler Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv03330
Defendant:
Warden Cothran, Officer Timmons, Warden Leamon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald C. Smalls and Gerald Smalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv02935
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Salley Elliott, Coach Speight and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton Donell Lyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williford v. Leamon et al
as 6:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Donovan D Williford
Defendant:
Gary Leamon, A/W Dean, Benji Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brockenberry et al
as 5:2016cv03192
Plaintiff:
Alfrigh Williams
Defendant:
Ruby Brockenberry, Belinda E Timmons, John Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Graham et al
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Leamon Bradley Todd
Defendant:
Lindsey Graham, Venus Enterprises and Cheri Magazine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linda Watson et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03367
Plaintiff:
Linda Watson , William Watson , Linda Bond and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Todd v President of Venus Enterprises
as 3:2008cv03644
Plaintiff:
Leamon Bradley Todd
Defendant:
President of Venus Enterprises
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Todd v. Geneva Convention,The et al
as 3:2008cv00660
Plaintiff:
Leamon Bradley Todd
Defendant:
Geneva Convention,The, Renaissance Inns, ABA Marshan Models and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
