Cases 21 - 30 of 6,676
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Collins v. Marfil et al
as 2:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
J. Marfil, Veach, Mereno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Lee Haddick v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00744
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Haddick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Che Lee v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2024cv02798
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Saldivar v. Superior Court of California, Fresno County
as 1:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Saldivar
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, Fresno County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry #310089 v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
LaQuint Cherry and Laquint Henry Lee Cherry
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rackham v. State of Idaho
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Rackham
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
