Cases 11 - 20 of 803
Keach v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keach
Defendant:
Ashly Taylor Martin, Stephen Taylor and Mary Beth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Wardlow
as 1:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Kelly Lee Pitts
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayfield v. Bradley County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Rayfield
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Moore
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Harrison et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Harrison, Taffy Ann Wilson and Samuel F Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ashton Jamarr Philip
Defendant:
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmody v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carmody
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv02793
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
