Cases 61 - 70 of 6,502
Townsend v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Lee Townsend
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GUTHRIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
ALEXANDER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
LEE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and JACOB SECORE
Leon Drummond, et al v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co, et al
as 24-1267
Plaintiff:
LEON DRUMMOND, LEE WILLIAMS, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and YESHONDA DRIGGINS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO and PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TOWNSEND v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
LEE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KIM v. FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
DR. JI YOON KIM
Defendant:
FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC and DR. GAHWA LEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Peng v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leon Peng
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
